Monday, October 16, 2006

CI- Is it about to rally?

Last week, I've posted that the CI was poised to test the 980 level, which is the upper boundary of the bearish wedge that the CI has been trapped in for the past 3 years.

The CI has not only tested the 980 level, it has in fact broken above that level. With this breakout, the wedge would become a continuation pattern for the CI's prior trend, which is a gradual uptrend that started in March 2001. On the other hand, if the CI had broken below the lower boundary of the wedge, the wedge would become a reversal pattern.

This breakout must hold up for a reasonable duration of 3 to 5 days and it must be accompanied with a large volume (which was present for the past 2 days). See Chart 1 below.

















Chart 1: CI's weekly chart as at Oct 13

From the monthly chart [Chart 2], we can see that the MACD has done a positive crossover, albeit a very marginal one, which must be confirmed by month-end closing. This MACD crossover is a fairly infrequent positive event (read: BUY signal). In the past 8 or 9 years, there have been 3 positive crossovers [denoted in Chart 2 as A1, A2 & A3].

















Chart 2: CI's monthly chart as at Oct 13

Of the past 3 MACD positive crossovers, A1 can qualify as a super-rally while the other two [A2 & A3] were mild rallies [see Chart 3 below].

















Chart 3: CI's monthly chart as at Oct 13 [overlaid with vertical lines]

I have tabulated the gain made in each of the past 3 rallies from the closing index in the month where the MACD confirmation was at hand to the peak index below. We can see that a mild rally can easily lead to a gain of 20-30% while a super rally could lead to a doubling of the index (I have serious doubt about this one).







Assuming that we have a real or genuine breakout (subject to confirmation by end of this month) and the CI is at, say 985; a mild rally lasting 5-7 months could put the CI to 1182 level. I dare not extrapolate where the CI would be if we have a super rally instead.

Important note: This is just a projection, which may or may not happen. There are a number of assumptions made which may not pan out in the manner that I've written here.

No comments: