They define stagflation as "any period of two quarters or more in which y/y CPI was above the overall average since 1948 and y/y GDP growth was below its overall average since 1948".
The average stagflation lasts about 8 quarters with the shortest lasting about 4 quarters. To measure stock performance, the stagflationary period is divided into 2 halves. During the first half of a stagflationary period, stock performance is generally negative (-11%) while performance in the second half is generally positive, with an average gain of 21% (see the Chart).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/629a6/629a6a379f3114784b5cb4cf4f6afc0a93fdb82b" alt=""
The article, however, did not provide any statistics on the stock performance prior to the stagflationary period. The stock market, being a leading indicator, would have adjusted easily 2 or 3 quarters before stagflation set in. If we were to factor in the loss incurred prior to the stagflationary period, the overall loss would likely to exceed 11% and possibly surpassing the average gain of 21% recorded during the second half of the stagflationary period. Otherwise, why should investors fear stagflation?
No comments:
Post a Comment